Already have a subscription? Log in
Selina wears a bodysuit by Moschino and shoes by chöke.
Anna wears a jacket, skirt and socks by Thom Browne, and shoes by Jimmy Choo.
We all scream for ice cream! There may be a new artistic director at the helm at Chanel, but you can still catch the resort collection at its softest serve
All of Anna’s clothes and accessories are by CHANEL.
John wears a T-shirt and trousers by Ewusie and shoes by Giorgio Armani.
Selina wears hats by chöke.
John wears a shirt by Giorgio Armani, sunglasses by AKONI Eyewear, and the stylist’s own necklaces.
All of Anna’s clothes and accessories are by Miu Miu.
Who has the freedom to move unconstrained? In the West Bank, where Palestinian mobility is governed by the Israeli military, nöl collective creates art under illegal occupation that stages the problem of movement. The artisan fashion brand has designed its own version of the two-player Levantine race game, Barjis, a game traditionally passed down from mother to daughter on her wedding day as a gift for her new home. Like Pachisi or Ludo, to win the game you must guide your counters around the board to arrive safely back home to the “kitchen”, represented on the board as a square motif beautifully rendered in Palestinian tatreez. Their board is the product of cross-Levantine artistry and collaboration; the Majdalawi cotton is woven in al-Khalil (Hebron) and the board is embroidered and screen-printed by hand in Ramallah. Instead of dice, the game is played with six cowrie shells sourced from Damascus. The welcome domesticity of the kitchen that animates each game of Barjis in some ways enacts life under occupation, where the private sphere can provide sanctuary from racialised hostility in the public sphere. With their first board game, nöl collective invites hospitality, community, and intimacy through the act of play, continuing to challenge Israeli repression through ancestral tradition and craft. Victory is achieved through movement, creating a psychic space for restoration and imagination that undermines Israeli containment. Soraya Odubeko
Les 9 Ombres eyeshadow palette by CHANEL Beauty.
Anna wears a jacket, shirt, trousers and tie by Joseph and shoes by Jimmy Choo.
All of Anna’s clothes are accessories are by Hermès.
All of Selina’s clothes are accessories are by Hermès.
John wears a top and trousers by Valentino and a belt by Celine Asmar.
In an age of instantaneous digital communication, physical correspondence can appear as mere curiosity. But in Lubaina Himid and Magda Stawarska’s new exhibition, Another Chance Encounter at Kettle’s Yard, the artists use old postcards not as anachronistic communication technology but a tool to recover the story of two marginalised historical figures.
At the centre of the exhibition at Kettle’s Yard is Slightly Bitter (2025), a multimedia installation inspired by the surviving correspondence between the Polish poet Sophie Brzeska and the Welsh artist and writer Nina Hamnett. Both were connected to French sculptor Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, Sophie Brzeska’s husband and Hamnett’s one-time lover, but it is little-known that the two women shared their own correspondence between 1917 and 1918, from which only Brzeska’s side of the correspondence survives. In Slightly Bitter, Himid and Stawarska seek to redress these elisions and fragmentations of the archive. The walls of the installation are lined by postcards from Himid’s personal collection, where the artists have rewritten the correspondences originally divulged in Brzeska’s biography Matka. Where there are silences, the artists engage in narrative invention, supplementing the archive with anecdotes and revelations from their own personal relationships. As viewers, it is hard to tell where Brzeska and Hamnett end, and Himid and Stawarska begin.
Another Chance Encounter is an unconventional take on the epistolary that employs postcards over their more serious sibling, the letter. For Himid and Stawarska, postcards are not kitschy ephemera, or anodyne reminders you forget to send your relatives on holiday. In this exhibition, the postcard becomes a vehicle for the thoughtful examination of memory, art history and human attachment. Soraya Odubeko
Installation view of Lubaina Himid with Magda Stawarska: Another Chance Encounter, 2025. Photo by Jo Underhill.
It began with a missing seat here, and a stolen pedal there. Then people started hiding entire bikes in their living rooms overnight, depriving Uber of its late-night profits. Now, the sound of clicking, wailing bike alarms is almost constant urban background noise as people bypass the apps to start up their rides. But the bikes aren’t only for getting from A to B: one viral TikTok shows a Lime bike unceremoniously hauled off a bridge and thrown onto a police car below during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. In another, French strikers line a motley collection of toppled e-bikes across a narrow Parisian street to prevent police cars from crossing their picket line.
Fast-casual chain restaurants fill bicycle baskets with their signature sauces in messy and vaguely disgusting marketing stunts. This summer, pictures of baskets filled with ice, drinks, and oysters went platinum on Instagram Reels. Lime has leaned into the disorder: in a paid collaboration, Timothée Chalamet rode a Lime bike onto the red carpet at the premiere of A Complete Unknown, leaving it parked in a red zone.
E-bikes have transformed pavements into the newest frontier of the platform economy. In many ways, they symbolise what’s wrong: the encroachment of Big Tech into our daily lives, the replacement of ownership with the illusion of convenience, and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few absent tech barons. But where Big Tech supposedly tries to introduce efficiency, new and marvellous enactments of disorder naturally follow. New technologies promise to change 21st-century travel, but they will first have to contend with the disobedient publics who address the privatisation and enclosure of their cities in unpredictable ways. Soraya Odubeko
Selina wears a shirt by MaxMara, a tie by Bella Freud, and a bracelet and
ring by Cartier.
Women have long complained that mainstream designers select silhouette over functionality when it comes to pockets, forcing the wearer to slow themselves down or occupy an arm with a bag. Across these pages, we celebrate the humble pocket, not only as a thing of use but also as an important psychic space in which we might place our most treasured belongings. The artist Kalina Sikorska has reinterpreted the pocket variously as a white, vac-formed sheet of plastic (above), which puts the usually hidden contents of the pocket on display, and making the pocket itself not secret but stage. Her metal pockets, overleaf, reconstruct in steel the 18th-century tie-on pockets worn by women across England from the working to upper classes. These pockets, extensively catalogued in collections such as the V&A’s, were an essential part of everyday dress, carrying the most used and valuable possessions, allowing women to carry about letters, scissors, spectacles, books, diaries and pens – the tools, in other words, required for participating in the world. Nell Whittaker
John wears a jacket, shirt and trousers by Qasimi and shoes by Prada.
Anna wears a shirt and trousers by Qasimi and holds a bag by Mulberry.
Top, Selina wears a necklace by TASAKI. Below, she wears a necklace by Alexandra Jefford. Her jacket is by Wardrobe.NYC.
The year is 1995. A few steps outside the Grand Palais in Paris, at the opening of a Paul Cézanne retrospective, Princess Diana is handed a Chouchou Dior Bag by Bernadette Chirac, the then-First Lady of France. With its boxy architecture, signature Cannage motif imprint and jangling charms – a nod to the notoriously superstitious Mr Dior himself – the bag is an immediate hit. Diana carried it with her constantly, and when she brought a mini version to the 1996 Met Gala, history was made: the bag would henceforth be known as the Lady Dior.
Over the ensuing three decades, the Lady Dior has become a true staple of the house. Dior has supported this constant evolution of the bag by instituting the Lady Dior Art Project, wherein the brand enlists artists from across the globe to reinterpret the iconic silhouette. Now in its tenth installment, pictured here is Ju Ting’s vibrant, architectural take on the bag. The design introduces soft, undulating curves to the sharp angles of the Lady Dior, covered in rainbow-hued, rippling calfskin frills. Echoing her paintings and sculptures, the bag finds a balance between form and utility. “I do not see functionality as a limitation on aesthetics – rather, I regard it as a source of inspiration,” she says. “The handbags continue the consistent philosophy behind my work – not to pursue momentary buzz or spectacle, but to emanate a lasting, whisper-like resonance that quietly yet powerfully touches the soul.”
A testament to the value within both heritage and its reinvention, the Lady Dior endures as something closer to a canvas than a bag: continually reimagined and bearing the traces of human craftsmanship. “[It] reflects a recurring theme in all my creations,” says Ting. “The belief that even as we rely on algorithms, we can still trust in the warmth of the human hand.” Matteo Pini
All of Anna’s clothes and accessories are by Valentino.
Anna wears socks by Hermès, and boots by Longchamp.
All of John’s clothes and accessories are by Saul Nash.
All of John’s clothes and accessories are by Prada.
Selina wears a jacket and trousers by Mordecai and shoes by Moschino. John wears a jacket and trousers by Mordecai and shoes by Prada. Anna wears a jacket by Mordecai, trousers by Saul Nash, and shoes by Jimmy Choo.